Top h4831sc load data Secrets
Top h4831sc load data Secrets
Blog Article
Given that there does not appear to be any "Formal" Load Data in existence for this Load, can many of you present a starting point with this combination and points to think about when Doing the job this Load up?
I gave up on it and went to other powder in the event the new powder was developing additional force and was slower when compared to the aged things. I don't don't forget if I even tried regular h4831 or not; I am wondering not. Simply click to develop...
4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I discovered this combo provides .5MOA groups with velocity about 3020fps out of a 26" barrel. I exploit this very same powder in my 300wm shooting 180gr products, so it's awesome to own a single powder for both.
Certainly you could. They are really exactly the same correct powder though the SC powder is just Slash shorter so it meters greater.
INgunner54 claimed: It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Uncovered a node and shot some teams.
I am aware, rough moments. H4831SC will certainly operate, I just failed to like the case density when loaded very long. I don't don't forget powder demand off the highest of my head but I was launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps and that is exactly where I normally purpose for being. As part of your case using what you've (and what I must have finished) I would start with the tip of your bearing surface from the bullet appropriate within the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths h4831sc from there when you finally look for a velocity node.
i've utilised both equally and utilized the very same charges and also have not been in a position to notify any noticable distinctions with general performance. the SC Variation meters a bit smoother is about all. h4831 vs h4831sc any reviews??
and you might like to invest in some new load data books. powder composition and chemistry can does adjust through the years. 4831 powder of decades ago is just not similar as what on earth is now available. that is why a person serious about reloading safely may have one of the most recent load data textbooks to confer with.
I've located the precise opposite for being legitimate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and equally correct powder in my three hundred Gain Mag.
You might have for making a couple of far more posts to get cleared to perform PM's. As you get to that status I would article within the categorized reloading part to see if any person is in your area to get a trade. Click on to grow...
Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, They are entirely various powders, with IMR 4831 being significantly speedier as opposed to Hodgdon variants. Never treat them as a similar powder, since they most absolutely are usually not.
That is an Intense extruded propellant and presents heightened insensitivity to hot and cold temperatures.
Each hold the Similar melt away rate, brief Minimize is available in useful For anyone who is at h4831sc max fill instead of at pressure/velocity that you would like you may get far more shortcut in a very circumstance.
IMR4831 and H4831SC are diverse. Exactly where there's a chance you're baffling it and thinking that it is actually near is H4831 and H4831SC are very very similar. Individuals two are pretty much the exact same besides H4831SC is built to more compact grains so it meters easier.